2026:JHHC:20492 --1-- Contempt Case (Civil) No.1043 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No.1043 of 2025 ---- 1(i). Bina Devi, D/o Late Ramesh Yadav 1(ii). Rupesh Kumar Yadav @ Bajrang Yadav, S/o Late Ramesh Yadav 1(iii). Ritu Raj Kumar @ Dharmendra Kumar, S/o Late Ramesh Yadav 1(iv). Rinku Kumar, S/o Late Ramesh Yadav 1(v). Laxmi Kumari, D/o Late Ramesh Yadav 1(vi). Raghu Raj Yadav @ Dabbu Yadav, S/o Late Ramesh Yadav 1(vii). Salini Devi, D/o Late Ramesh Yadav 1(viii). Babita Devi, W/o Late Rajesh Yadav, daughter-in-law of Late Ramesh Yadav All are resident of Sardar Chowk, Bada Bazar Bishnu Mandir Gali, PO – Hazaribagh, PS – Bada Bazar, District - Hazaribagh 2. Dharmendra Yadav @ Rituraj Kumar, aged about 35 years, S/o Ramesh Yadav R/o village – Sirsi, PO and PS – Katkamdag, District – Hazaribagh, at present residing at Bada Bazar, Vishnu Mandir Gali, Sadar Chowk, PO – Hazaribagh, PS – Hazaribagh (TOP-1), District – Hazaribagh, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Raj Kishore Prasad, the Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Hazaribagh, having his office at Hazaribagh Collectoriate, PO, PS and District - Hazaribagh .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Ms. Karishma Kumari, Advocate :- Mr. Sunil Kr. Rana, Advocate For the State :- Mr. S. Ahmad, Advocate ---- 02/10.07.2026 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.2 is the son of deceased petitioner No.1 and in view of that 2026:JHHC:20492 --2-- Contempt Case (Civil) No.1043 of 2025 substitution of petitioner No.2 is not necessary along with other legal heirs/successors. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 has left for his heavenly abode on 02.10.2025 and I.A. No.5813 of 2026 has been filed for substituting the name of legal heirs/successors of petitioner No.1. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that three sons and four daughters as well as wife of the deceased petitioner are legal heirs/successors of petitioner No.1 as disclosed in paragraph No.1 of the I.A. itself. She submits in view of that she may kindly be allowed to substitute the name of legal heirs/successors of petitioner No.1. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State has got no objection. 5. The prayer made in the I.A. is allowed and disposed of. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners will substitute the name of legal heirs/successors of petitioner No.1 in the course of the day, except the petitioner No.2 as he is already party as petitioner No.2. 7. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and State jointly submits that Miscellaneous Case No.47/2015-16 has already been disposed of and in view of that the writ court’s order has been complied with. Accordingly, this contempt proceeding is dropped and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 10.07.2026 Sangam/