IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32974 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2024 Thana- Vishanpur District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Md. Saddam S/o Jakir @ Md. Zakir Resident of Village- Bagmara, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmala Kumari, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 19-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner seeking bail in connection with Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 309(4), 309(6) & 109(1) of the B.N.S. read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on 09.05.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 18507 of 2025 which reads as follows:- “These applications are arising out of the same P.S. Case Number i.e., Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024. Hence, they are being heard together and are being decided by a common order. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 3. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 23 of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32974 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026 2/3 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 309(4), 309(6), 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 4. As per the prosecution case, three unknown criminals looted four kilograms of silver and four bhars of gold from the informant and thereafter when the co-villagers tried to catch hold of the criminals, one of the criminals fired from his pistol which caused injury to one villager. 5. So far as the petitioner namely Mun Munga Saha is concerned, he has given a self- inculpatory statement and has confessed his involvement in the crime. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents also. The petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2024. 6. So far as the petitioner namely Tanveer Alam @ Tanveer is concerned, the name of the petitioner has come in the case during investigation. The petitioner has confessed his involvement in the crime and also stated the name of other accused persons as his associates. The petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2024 and has two criminal antecedents. 7. So far as the petitioner namely Md. Saddam is concerned, his name has come in the case on the confessional statement of co- accused Lalu @ Gulab. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent and is in custody since 05.12.2024. 8. So far as the petitioner namely Kuddam is concerned, the name of the petitioner in the case has come on the confessional statement of co-accused Lalu @ Gulab. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents and is in custody since 05.12.2024. 9. Considering the allegations levelled against the petitioners as well as the criminal antecedents of the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 10. Accordingly, these applications for regular bail are hereby rejected.” Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32974 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026 3/3 4. Thereafter, the petitioner has approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the Hon’ble Supreme Court had dismissed the Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 9655/2025 of the petitioner vide the following order:- “Upon hearing the counsel, the Court made the following ORDER Having considered the averments made in the counter affidavit filed by the State of Bihar, we find no good ground and reason to interfere with the impugned judgment(s)/order(s) passed by the High Court at this stage. The special leave petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.” 5. Considering the allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to review my earlier order. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again. sadique/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T