Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2003 (KAR)

MS GUNA K THANTRY v. STATE BY PEENYA POLICE STATION

CRL.P/823/2019 · 2026-03-03

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12854 CRL.P No. 823 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 823 OF 2019 (482(Cr.PC)/ 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MS. GUNA K. THANTRY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS W/O. MR. RAJEEV SINGH PATIAL NO.3 (OLD NOS.18 & 23) 3RD MAIN ROAD, 1ST PHASE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU-560 058. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANJAY YADAV., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MAHESH S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY PEENYA POLICE STATION BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PADARAYANAPALYA, 2ND CROSS, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, NEAR JALAHALLI CROSS, BENGALURU-560 058 2. MADHU JAIN AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, D/O JINESH KUMAR JAIN NO.2823, 'MADHU NIWAS' S.M.ROAD, T.DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 057. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.R.PATIL, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12854 CRL.P No. 823 of 2019 RESPONDENT NO.2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT DATED 12.01.2019 (ANNEXURE-A) AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.25/2019 (ANNEXURE-B) REGISTERED ON 12.01.2019 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 PEENYA POLICE STATION AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S 354(A), 354(D), 354, 506 AND 114 R/W 34 OF IPC AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Sri. Sanjay Yadav, learned counsel appearing for Sri. Mahesh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous, as the charge sheet is already filed. 2. His submission is noted. In that view of the matter, the criminal petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29