Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2003 (GAU)

HAKAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Crl.Pet./401/2026 · 2026-03-18

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010054902026 2026:GAU-AS:3989 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./401/2026 HAKAM S/O- CHAND BHAN, VILL.-SHADIPUR, P.O. -NAGINA, P.S.-NAGINA, DIST.- MEWAT, HARYANA, PIN-122108 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED P.P., ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S AHMED, T UDDIN,MR M RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, :: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R 19.03.2026 Heard Mr. S. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Bhaskar Sharma, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. Page No.# 2/2 2. This an application under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 in respect of PRC Case No.493/2018 pending in the court of the learned S.D.J.M. (S), Barpeta arising out of Howly P.S. Case No.363/2018. 3. Police had some information that some miscreants were looting money from different people at the Howly Bazar ATM. 4. The petitioner Hakam Khan was arrested by police. Some other miscreants managed to escape. 5. Post investigation, the charge sheet was laid against the present petitioner. Now, this petitioner claims that he is not the actual Hakam Khan. According to the petitioner, another person by the same name, aged about 23 years, is the actual culprit. 6. After considering the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides, the petitioner is directed to raise the issue before the trial court. With the aforesaid direction, the criminal petition is dismissed and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant