[2026:RJ-JP:1047] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20116/2025 Dr. Sunita Agarwal W/o Sanjeev Agarwal, Resident Of B-83, Ganesh Marg, 301, Golden Jewel, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur, 302015. ----Petitioner Versus 1. University Of Rajasthan, Through Registrar, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. The Vice-Chancellor, University Of Rajasthan, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Government Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Shah, Sr. Advocate assisted by Ms. Pragya Seth For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 12/01/2026 1. The present petition has been filed on the ground that respondents have not granted the pensionary benefits to the petitioner, for which, petitioner has filed representations vide Annexure-15 & 16 and also sent a legal notice for demand of justice (Annexure-17), but a deaf ear has been given by the respondent i.e. University of Rajashtan. 2. Heard and considered the submission made insofar, and perused the material available on record. 3. In view of the same, respondent No.1 is directed to consider the representation vide Annexure-15 & 16 and legal [2026:RJ-JP:1047] (2 of 2) [CW-20116/2025] notice sent vide Annexure-17 or any other representation, if filed, by the petitioner, within a period of seven days from the date of passing of this order; and same shall be decided by the respondents within a period of 30 days from the date of submission of the same, strictly in accordance with law, as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena v. State of Rajasthan and ors.: SBCWP No. 1665/2024 and circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). 4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the abovesaid directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 5. It is made clear that if the petitioner is still aggrieved of disposal of his representation, he will be at liberty to approach appropriate forum, in accordance with law. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /17