Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20026 (RAJ)

PRAVEEN KUMAR SON OF LATE SHRI RAMESH SHANKAR AGARWAL v. KISHOR SINGH SON OF SHRI GIRVAR SINGH

CW/18781/2025 · 2026-01-21

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2702] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18781/2025 Praveen Kumar Son Of Late Shri Ramesh Shankar Agarwal, Aged About 67 Years, R/o 107, Dharampura, Bagh Bhatayari, G.t. Road, Ghaziabad (U.P.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Kishor Singh Son Of Shri Girvar Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Badgurjaron Ki Dhani, Tan Biharipur, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, P.s. Patan District Sikar (Raj.) 2. Girvar Singh Son Of Late Shri Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Badgurjaron Ki Dhani, Tan Biharipur, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, P.s. Patan District Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brijendra Singh Kachhawa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Gupta with Ms. Sampati Sharma & Ms. Anushree Agrawal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 21/01/2026 1. With the consent of both the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in the following terms:- (i) The present writ petition is confined to the order dated 14.11.2025, whereby the right of rebuttal was not permitted to the plaintiffs, which has been decided by the order as first application. (ii) Both the parties are in agreement that the plaintiff is always entitled to reserve his right of rebuttal with regard to the issues, the burden of proof of which lies upon the defendant. [2026:RJ-JP:2702] (2 of 2) [CW-18781/2025] (iii) Therefore, this Court directs that if there is any issue, the burden of which is on the defendants, plaintiff would be entitled to produce evidence in rebuttal after the evidence of the defendants. 2. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/KRATIKA/3