[2026:RJ-JP:249] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous III Bail Application No. 15693/2025 Yogendra @ Chhatkani @ Ovendra S/o Shri Harichand, R/o Dharapura, Police Station Rajakhera, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/01/2026 1. The instant third bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 109/2025 registered at Police Station Raja Khera, District Dholpur for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 125 and 352 of BNS and 5/27 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the first bail application of the accused- petitioner was dismissed with liberty to file afresh after recording of the statements of injured witnesses and thereafter the injured witness has been examined. The second bail application of the accused-petitioner was dismissed on the ground that the petitioner did not approach the Trial Court, thereafter, the [2026:RJ-JP:249] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15693/2025] petitioner approached the Trial Court and the Trial Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application. It is contended that prima-facie offence under Section 109 of BNS is not made out against the petitioner as no fire arm injury was received to injured Bunty @ Dharmender Singh. The injured has received five injuries out of which four injuries was complaint of pain and only one injury which was at right shoulder was found simple blunt in nature and had there been any intention to kill the injured then the petitioner could have fired at the injured, however, no such injury was received to the injured which is dangerous to life. The petitioner has been falsely implicated by the police and the complainant, the petitioner is in custody since 20.05.2025 and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the third bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the third bail application and contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender and against him five cases under various offences under IPC and BNS have been registered, further it is alleged against the petitioner that he opened fire at the injured and two empty cartridges along with the gun was also recovered, therefore, considering the above facts, the third bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Admittedly, the injured did not receive any injury and the injury sustained to the injured is at right shoulder was found to be simple blunt in nature. It is not desirable to express anything upon the merits of the case, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 20.05.2025 and further trial of the case may take considerable [2026:RJ-JP:249] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15693/2025] time, therefore, considering the above facts, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the third bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Yogendra @ Chhatkani @ Ovendra S/o Shri Harichand, in connection with FIR No. 109/2025 registered at Police Station Raja Khera, District Dholpur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/8