Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20023 (PNJ)

PRACHI DUREJA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/14890/2026 · 2026-05-13

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 137 CWP-14890-2026 Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 PRACHI DUREJA ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Saksham Mahajan, Advocate and Ms. Prerna Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G. Haryana (assisted by Dr. Vikas Swami, Deputy Civil Surgeon, Disability Incharge) *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to examine her and issue disability certificate as applied vide application dated 29.04.2026. 2. The petitioner is claiming that she is disabled to the extent of 60% and falls within definition of ‘person with disability’ as per Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The respondent has not issued her requisite certificate. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that petitioner has been called for medical examination. She would be examined by a Board of Doctors and requisite certificate in accordance with law would be issued. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.13 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-14890-2026 -2- The needful would be done within two weeks from today provided petitioner comes forward for medical examination. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. 5. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE May 13, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.13 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment