TANWAR SINGH SHEKHAWAT S/O LADU SINGH SHEKHAWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15373/2025 · 2026-01-24
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20017 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20017 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3376] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15373/2025 Tanwar Singh Shekhawat S/o Ladu Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Bhawanipura, Police Station Reengus, District Sikar, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Is Confined In Jail Neemkathana). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ladu Singh Shekhawat F/o accused For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/01/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.439/2025 registered at Police Station Reengus, District Sikar for offences under Section 189(2), 119(1), 115(2), 109(1), 126(2) & 111(2) (b) of BNS.
2. Mr. Ladu Singh Shekhawat, the father of the accused petitioner puts appearance on behalf of the accused petitioner and submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely because he is the friend of the co-accused Narendra. He also submits that the accused petitioner is in custody for last more than two months. He also submits that no specific overt act has been assigned to the accused petitioner and
[2026:RJ-JP:3376] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15373/2025] none of the injuries sustained by the complainant party has been opined to be dangerous to life.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Having taken into consideration the contents of the FIR, wherein there is no specific overt act has been assigned to the accused petitioner and none of the injuries sustained by the complainant party has been opined to be dangerous to life, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) each, together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)(each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /24