IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103 CRWP-5569-2026 Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 PARKASH ALIAS OM PARKASH ......... Peoner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate for Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Shiva Khurmi, D.A.G., Haryana. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) FIR No. Dated Police Sta1on Sec1ons 343 13.08.2016 Kherki Khaula, District Gurgaon 395 IPC 1. The present peon has been filed under Arcle 226/227 of the Constuon of India read with Secon 3 and 4 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022 for issuance of the writ in the nature of mandamus to respondents No. 2 to 4 to grant parole of 10 weeks to peoner in above caponed FIR. 2. State counsel has referred to the representaon dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure P-1) and submits that the name of the district has not been menoned therein and in the absence of the district name, the representaon cannot be decided. 3. Counsel for the peoner seeks permission to withdraw the present peon with liberty to file a fresh representaon, with a direcon that the same be decided within the me limit prescribed under the statute and the relevant rules. 4. Given above, the present peon stands disposed of having been withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. It is clarified that in case the peoner files a fresh representaon, the same shall be decided within the me limit prescribed under the statute and the relevant rules. The outcome of the peon shall also be communicated to counsel for the peoner in JYOTI 2026.05.14 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5569-2026 -2- case the email ID is menoned therein. All pending miscellaneous applicaons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 13.05.2026 Jyo -II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2026.05.14 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.