ROOPA @ LALITA DEVI W/O SATISH @ SATRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15497/2025 · 2026-01-12
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20014 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20014 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1108] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15497/2025
1. Roopa @ Lalita Devi W/o Satish @ Satram, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Parvaini, Police Station Raini, District Alwar (Raj.).
2. Pooja @ Shimla Devi W/o Rakesh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Parvaini, Police Station Raini, District Alwar (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Meghraj Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 12/01/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 172/2025, registered with the Police Station, Raini, District Alwar for offence punishable u/S 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 352, 125 of B.N.S. 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused factual report.
4. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is that they were involved in an incident of giving beating to the complainant party.
[2026:RJ-JP:1108] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15497/2025]
5.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioners are women and in view of the directions of this Court vide order dated 03.12.2025 the accused-petitioners have appeared before the Investigating Officer.
6. The fact regarding the appearance of the accused-petitioners before the Investigating Officer is verified by the learned Public Prosecutor.
7. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and taking into consideration the allegations levelled against the accused-petitioners and more particularly the fact that accused-petitioners are women and there are no specific allegation assigned to them in the F.I.R. and further they have already joined the investigation in view of the directions of this Court, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
8. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station, Raini, District Alwar in F.I.R. No. 172/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
[2026:RJ-JP:1108] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15497/2025] (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.
( GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /171