MUJTABA MAHMOOD MAHMOOD KHAN and ORS v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AURANGABAD and ORS
CP/49/2006 · 2026-10-14
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20014 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20014 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 903 CP-49.2006.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 49 OF 2006 IN WP/2764/2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1896 OF 2008 IN CP/49/2006 MUJTABA MAHMOOD MAHMOOD KHAN AND OTHERS VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AURANGABAD AND OTHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- None for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondent-State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 14 October, 2026
Order (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) :
1. None for the petitioners.
2. As the learned Advocate for the petitioners is elevated and thereafter retired as a Judge of this Court, notices were issued to the petitioners, but till date no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
3. Learned AGP, on instructions, submits that the order under contempt is complied with. In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition and it stands disposed of alongwith pending civil application.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde