Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20012 (MAD)

Tamilarasi v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Anna Nagar

CRL OP(MD)/5837/2026 · 2026-03-25

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.5837 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 25/03/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No.5837 of 2026 1. Tamilarasi,, 2. Venkatammal,, ... Petitioners/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai City. Crime No. 123 of 2026.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Praburamachandran, For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 123 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.5837 of 2026 ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 191(2), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), 351(3) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.123 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, on 08.02.2026, the petitioner, along with the other accused, trespassed into the defacto complainant’s house, damaged the household articles and attacked him with a coconut knife and causing severe injuries to him. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are no way connected in the above said incident. They have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and also submitted that the petitioners and the defacto complainant are relaties. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.5837 of 2026 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) fairly submits that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the petitioners have no previous cases. However, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners and also considering the facts that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and no previous case is pending against the petitioners and the grant of anticipatory bail to the co-accused by this Court, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, and on further conditions that: 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.5837 of 2026 [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks, and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation. [c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. (P D B J) 25.03.2026 tta 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.5837 of 2026 TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madeira. 2.Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai City, 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.5837 of 2026 P. DHANABAL,J tta ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.5837 of 2026 Date : 25/03/2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis