Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20012 (AP)

P.SIDDAIAH v. STATE OF AP

WP/7622/2019 · 2026-03-17

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010176742019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7622/2019 Between: 1. P.SIDDAIAH, S/O. LATE PULLANNA, 44 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. P.RAMASUBBAIAH, S/O. LATE PULLANNA, 49 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. P.NARAYANA, S/O. LATE PEDDA SUBBAIAH, 64 YRS., AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. P. DASTAGIRI BABU, S/O.NAGANNA, 36 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O.THIPPIREDDYPALLY VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. K.SUBBARAYUDU, S/O. PEDDA SUBBANNA, 50 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. P. VEERAIAH, SIO. NAGAIAH, 56 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. P. OBAIAH, S/O. NAGAIAH, 51 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. N. SUBBANNA, S/O.BALA OBAIAH, 65 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, 2 JS, J W.P.No.7622/2019 R/O.THIPPIREDDYPALLY VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT 9. P.OBULAMMA, W/O. LATE OBANNA, 51 YRS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHAPADU POLICE STATION, CHAPADU, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPT, MYDUKURU DIVISION, MYDUKURU KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, CHAPADU MANDAL, CHAPADU, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHAPADU MANDAL, CHAPADU, KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, THIPPAREDDYPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, THIPPAREDDYPALLY, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. P KONDAIAH, S/O. LATE PITCHAIAH, 66 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. P OBAIAH, SIO. LATE OBANNA, 54 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 9. B ANJANEYULU, S/O. LATE GANNANA, 51 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3 JS, J W.P.No.7622/2019 10. P RAMA SIDDAIAH, S/O. LATE SUBBAIAH, 46 YRS., AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 11. C VIJAYA BHASKAR, S/O. LATE GURRAPPA, 53 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THIPPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 6 herein in trying to interfere with our peaceful possession anc enjoyment of the land in Sy.No. 852 of Anantapuram village H/o. Thippareddypally village, Chapadu Mandal, Kadapa District for laying the road alleging that there exists a rastha leading to Kallur village even though the same was abanioned about a century ago at the behest of the respondents 7 to 12 herein owing to their pressures brought out through their local political ruling party leaders even ter resistance extended by most of the villagers including the petitioners herein for the same and that too during the currency of the suits filed by the 1st petitioner in OS No.65/2017 as well the respondents 7 to 11 in OS No. 550/2018 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Proddatur, and the further action of the 2nd respondent in threatening the petitioners to withdraw the suit filed by them and to part with the possession of the aforesaid land by interfering with the civil dispute which was ceased up by the competent Civil Court, that too without following the procedure contemplated under law, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in clear negation of established judicial precedents, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 6 not to take any measure sfor laying of the road through the lands of the petitioners situated in Sy. No.852 of Ananthapuram village, Chapadu Mandal, Kadapa District, without following the procedure contemplated under law, pending the disposal of the above WP, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 4 JS, J W.P.No.7622/2019 1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. V R REDDY KOVVURI 4. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP) 5. G SESHADRI 5 JS, J W.P.No.7622/2019 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri.Shaik Omer Qaiyum, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.03.2026 rsd 6 JS, J W.P.No.7622/2019 247 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7622/2019 Date: 18.03.2026 rsd