Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 904 CP-45.2010.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 45 OF 2010 IN WP/3174/2005 KAMLAKAR GANPAT KOTE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. K.M. Nagarkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Uma Bhosale, A.G.P. for respondent-State. Mr. Shubham Kote, Advocate holding for Mr. A.V. Hon, Advocate for respondent No. 6. Mr. H.A. Shinde, Advocate holding for Mr. V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for respondent No. 7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 14 October, 2026
Order (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) :
1. Learned advocate for respondent No.6-Municipal Corporation submits that the order under contempt is complied with by demolishing the Shopping Complex, as
directed by this Court in the Writ Petition. Learned advocate for respondent No.7 also confirms the said fact.
2. In view of the statements made by learned advocates for the respondent Nos.6 and 7, nothing survives in this petition and it is therefore disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde