Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20008 (AP)

Edupuganti Sujeeth Kumar v. THE STATE OF AP

CRLRC/713/2019 · 2026-01-26

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010191072019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 713/2019 Between: 1. EDUPUGANTI SUJEETH KUMAR,, S/O. JANARDHANARAO AGE 25 YEARS, R/O. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE SATRAMPADU, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Through the Sub-Inspector of Police Pedavegi Police Station, West Godavari District Rep.by Public Prosecutor High Court at Amaravati ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by the Petitioner / Accused No.1, impugning the judgment dated 26.06.2019 passed in Crl.A.No.66 of 2017 on the file of the Court of II Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari, Eluru, modifying the judgment dated 09.02.2017 passed in C.C.No.183 of 2016 by the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Special Mobile Court, Eluru. 2. Accused No.1 and defacto complainant appeared before this Court and were identified and copies of their Aadhar cards attested by them are filed for proper identification. 3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. 2 4. The defacto complainant would submit that at the intervention of elders and well-wishers of both parties, the matter was amicably settled between her and the Accused No.1. Hence, she does not want to proceed against the Accused No.1 and finally prays for allowing the present Criminal Revision Case. 5. Considering the submissions, in the interests of justice, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed setting aside the judgment dated 26.06.2019 passed in Crl.A.No.66 of 2017 on the file of the Court of II Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari, Eluru, modifying the judgment dated 09.02.2017 passed in C.C.No.183 of 2016 by the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Special Mobile Court, Eluru. Accused No.1 is acquitted from the present case. Petitioner / Accused No.1 shall pay costs of Rs.20,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to spend the said amount to meet the necessities of the children in the Government Home. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:27.01.2026 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:713 OF 2019 Dt.27.01.2026 Asr