Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20007 (MAD)

Selvarani v. Muthu

CMP(MD)/3445/2026 · 2026-03-17

M Jothiraman, N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P(MD)No.3445 of 2026 in W.A(MD)SR.No.20849 of 2026 C.M.P(MD)No.3445 of 2026 in W.A(MD)SR.No.20849 of 2026 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN , J. O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.] The petitioner, who is a third party to the writ petition, has filed the present petition seeking leave of this Court to prefer a Writ Appeal against the order of the writ Court dated 28.11.2025 made in W.P(MD)No. 34620 of 2025. 2.According to the petitioner, she is the absolute owner of the southern portion of Survey No.173/9 by virtue of a registered gift deed dated 24.02.2025, and she is a proper and necessary party. Without impleading the petitioner as a party to the writ petition, the first respondent/writ petitioner has obtained an order to survey the land. Further, there exists a dispute between the parties, and a civil suit is also pending. 3.Heard Mr.R.Balakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.S.P.Maharajan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P(MD)No.3445 of 2026 in W.A(MD)SR.No.20849 of 2026 for the respondents 2 and 3 and Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, learned Government Advocate appearing for the fourth respondent. 4.Considering the fact that the impugned order has a bearing on the petitioner’s rights, we are of the view that leave deserves to be granted. 5.Accordingly, leave is granted and this petition stands ordered. [N.S.K., J.] [M.J.R., J.] 17.03.2026 ps 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P(MD)No.3445 of 2026 in W.A(MD)SR.No.20849 of 2026 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN , J. ps C.M.P(MD)No.3445 of 2026 in W.A(MD)SR.No.20849 of 2026 17.03.2026 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis