CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. TAPAN MANDAL AND ANR.
EC-COM/162/2026 · 2026-05-21
Gaurang Kanth
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20003 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20003 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
OCD-195
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA COMMERCIAL DIVISION ORIGINAL SIDE
EC-COM/162/2026
CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED VS TAPAN MANDAL AND ANR.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH Date : 21st May, 2026. Appearance: Ms. Shrayashee Das, Adv. Ms. Anukriti Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Tridibesh Dasgupta, Adv. …for the award-holder
The Court: Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the award-holder seeks permission to withdraw the present execution petition on the ground that the award sought to be executed was rendered by a learned Sole Arbitrator who had been unilaterally appointed. It is submitted that, in view of the judgment dated 14.05.2026 rendered by this Court in EC-COM 334 of 2026, such an award is non est in the eyes of law and is incapable of execution. In view of the aforesaid submission, the present execution petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved in favour of the award-holder to initiate fresh arbitral proceedings before a duly and validly constituted Arbitral Tribunal, appointed in accordance with law.
(GAURANG KANTH, J.)
R.Bhar