Smt Vindhya Dronamraju v. Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation
WP/7962/2019 · 2026-01-01
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, Tuhin Kumar Gedela
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20003 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20003 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010184982019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.7962 of 2019 Between:
1. SMT. VINDHYA DRONAMRAJU, W/o. SRI D.V.S.S. LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O D.No.8-1-299/SV/2, SENOR VALLEY, SHAIKPET VILLAGE, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD.
...PETITIONER AND
1. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, REP.
BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, SITUATED AT D.NO. 2-2- 388/B, NARASIMHATEERTHAM ROAD, BALAJI COLONY, TIRUPATHI - 517 502.
2. M/S KALAHASTEESHWARA STEELS PVT. LTD., OFFICE AT PLOT NO.239, FLAT NO.G1, SRIRAMA NILAYAM, KAMALAPURI COLONY, SRI NAGAR COLONY, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. C.S. REDDY.
3. SRI CHENNAREDDY VINAY BABU, S/O SRI CHENNAREDDY SESHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. G1, SRI RAMA NILAYAM, KAMALAPURI COLONY, SRI NAGAR COLONY, HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y NAGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. C SRINIVASA BABA
2. O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.7962 of 2019
O R D E R: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Pursuant to the Memo dated 27.10.2025 filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the Registry to list the matter for withdrawal, the writ petition is listed today under the caption “For Withdrawal”.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties have entered into a compromise and settled the matter in the City Civil Court, Hyderabad, and thereby, requests permission to withdraw the writ petition.
3. None appeared on behalf of the respondents to oppose the same.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, in this case shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
______________________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date: 02.01.2026 IBL
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT PETITION No.7962 of 2019
Dt: 02.01.2026 IBL