[2026:RJ-JP:4193] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23803/2018 Ram Pal Meena Son Of Shri Lala Ram Meena, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Gram Bhatawala Tehsil Amer, Post Sayapura Jaipur 302027 (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Secretary, Jln Marg, Jaipur. 2. Bhola Ram, Supervisor, (Phe), Jda Jln Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Saugath Roy For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dilip Singh Kurka HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 29/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: i) It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that your lordship may graciously be pleased to allow the writ petition and by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned order dated 6.6.2018 of promotion of the respondent no 2 to the post of supervisor(PHE) in JDA be quashed and set aside with further direction to the respondent JDA to convene the review DPC for the post of Supervisor and to promote the petitioner to the post of supervisor with all consequential benefits on the basis of seniority. ii) Any prejudicial order, if any passed during the pendency of the writ petition be taken on record and further be quashed and set aside. [2026:RJ-JP:4193] (2 of 3) [CW-23803/2018] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 19.03.2012 in SB CWP No.488/2011 titled as Kamal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court submits that the issue raised herein is already decided by the ratio laid down in case of Kamal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), therefore the writ petition be decided in accordance with ratio laid down in case of Kamal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties, it is appropriate to disposed the writ petition on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Kamal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), if applicable upon facts and circumstances of the case. 4. For ready reference, relevant para is reproduced as under: “Having regard controversy, I direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion on the post of LDC notionally against the vacancy become available on account of death of Shravan Kumar, if petitioner is found adjudged suitable. The promotion shall take effect from the date, respondent No.3 was promoted on the post of LDC. Petitioner would be entitled for notional benefits and would liable to be placed above respondent No.3 in the seniority list of LDC. With that direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Compliance of the judgment shall be made within a period of three months from the date of submission of certified copy of this order before the respondents.” [2026:RJ-JP:4193] (3 of 3) [CW-23803/2018] 5. Thus, the writ petition is disposed in aforementioned terms and the respondents are directed to consider the case of petitioner within 30 days from date of receipt of copy of this order, and if ratio is applicable, extend same relief to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /94