- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 934 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4566 OF 2025 SUSHILA SACHIN UDAWANT AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1365 OF 2025 SATYAJEET SACHIN UDAWANT AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER Mr.D.S.Patil, Advocate for the Applicants in both Applications. Mr.C.V.Bhadane, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr.H.S.Surve, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) DATE : 13th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned Advocates for the respective parties and the learned APP. 2. In pursuance to the order dated 01.09.2026, the parties were directed to remain present before the learned Trial Court and point out the settlement terms in between the parties. However, though the Applicant/Accused persons were present before the Trial Court, khs/Oct.2026/4566 2026:BHC-AUG:48761-DB - 2 - however, though the Applicants/Accused persons were present before the learned Trial Court, however, informant/complainant could not appear before the Court and therefore the terms of compromise could not be executed. However, Respondent No.2 has filed the affidavit in reply before this Court and in paragraph No.3, it has been observed that, “this deponent unequivocally says that she is not objecting to the reliefs claimed in the present petition in the light of the compromise arrived at between the parties.” 3. In view of the aforesaid statement, the instant applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. The Sessions Case bearing No.111/2023 registered pursuant to FIR bearing No.63/2020, for the charges punishable u/s 307, 420, 498-A, 354-A, 120-B and 506 of the IPC pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, Dist.Aurangabad is hereby quashed and set aside and both these Applications are disposed of. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) khs/Oct.2026/4566