P.V.Rama Raju v. The Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited
WP/9711/2021 · 2026-01-05
V Sujatha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19999 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19999 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010179972021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 9711/2021 Between:
1. P.V.RAMA RAJU,, S/O.KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT-49 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, RIO.61-13-18, KRISHNAVENI ROAD, RAMALINGESWARA NAGAR, KRISHNALANKA, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, PIN-520013
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED, (APSCSCL) REP., BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO.10-152/1, SRI SAI TOWERS, 4TH FLOOR, ASHOKNAGAR, BESIDES SIRIS COMPANY, BANDAR ROAD, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA
2. THE DISTRICT MANAGERAPSCSCL, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
3. THE DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
5. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
6. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM,
2 VS,J W.P.No.9711 of 2021
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
7. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH
8. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
9. THE VISAKHAPATNAM LORRY OPERATORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE OPPOSITE TO HPCL NORTH GATE, PORT EXIM PARK AREA, NAVAL BASE P.O., VISAKHAPATNAM-530014, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official Respondents in (i) not ensuring smooth passage for the petitioner's vehicles, which are carrying essential commodities under Public Distribution System, and (ii) not taking action against 9th Respondent, which is illegally obstructing the transportation of essential commodities by the Petitioner, as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, discriminatory, without jurisdiction, and contrary to Law and in violation of the Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official Respondents to ensure smooth passage for vehicles carrying essential commodities and take action against 9th Resondent IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the official Respondents to ensure smooth passage for the petitioner's vehicles, which are carrying essential commodities under Public Distribution System, by restraining the 9th Respondent from obstructing the same, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
3 VS,J W.P.No.9711 of 2021
1.
SRINIVAS BOBBILI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. MD.SALEEM SC For APSCSC Limited,Vijayawda The Court made the following:
4 VS,J W.P.No.9711 of 2021
ORDER:
Today when the writ petition came up for hearing, Sri. M. Vinodin Ruth,
learned counsel representing Sri. Bobbili Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no further orders are required in this writ petition and that it has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. ____________________
JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
06.01.2026 Gss