Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27337 CRL.RP No. 131 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.131 OF 2026 BETWEEN:
1.
YAAHVI VENTURES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM INCORPORATED UNDER PARTNERSHIP ACT HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.371 2ND FLOOR, TADIMALLAS 13TH MAIN ROAD RMV EXTENTION BENGALURU-560 096 REPRESENTED BY SRI. VASUDEVAMURTHY N.
2.
VASUDEVAMURTHY N., PARTNER S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED 68 YEARS R/AT. NO.371, 2ND FLOOR TADIMALLAS 13TH MAIN ROAD RMV EXTENTION, BENGALURU-560 096.
3.
V. NEHAL PARTNER S/O VASUDEVAMURTHY N AGED 33 YEARS R/AT NO.371, 2ND FLOOR TADIMALLAS 13TH MAIN ROAD RMV EXTENTION, BENGALURU-560 096.
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27337 CRL.RP No. 131 of 2026
4.
PADMAVATHI K., PARTNER W/O VASUDEVAMURTHY N AGED 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.371, 2ND FLOOR TADIMALLAS 13TH MAIN ROAD, RMV EXTENTION BENGALURU-560 096. …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MOHAN KUMAR M.E., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
M.L. PRAKASH RAO S/O LATE DR. M.G. LAKSHMAN RAO AGED 78 YEARS R/AT NO.35, SRIKANTAN LAYOUT HIGH GROUNDS BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER SMT. NAGARATHNA PRAKASH RAO W/O M L PRAKASH RAO. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. AJAY J. NANDALIKE, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND FINE IMPOSED BY THE LD XV ADDL.CMM DATED 29.08.2024 IN CC NO.33576/2021 AND JUDGMENT DATED 24.10.2025 IN CRL.A NO.1558/2024 PASSED BY THE LXVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-67), BY CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE XV ADDL. CMM DATED 29.08.2024 IN CC NO.33576/2021 AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO ACQUIT THE PETITIONERS BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27337 CRL.RP No. 131 of 2026
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent.
2. This Court vide order dated 11.02.2026 suspended sentence, subject to depositing 50% of fine amount before the Trial Court which shall be inclusive of the amount already deposited, if any within a period of four weeks and the same has not been complied with. Hence, the question of considering the revision petition does not arise, in view of non-compliance of conditional order passed by this Court.
3. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed, in view of non-compliance of conditional order passed by this Court and the appeal is also not yet admitted.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3