[2026:JHHC:20688] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5885 of 2026 ------ 1. Kripal Jogi, Aged about 36 years, S/O- Kallan Jogi @ Kallan, R/O- Mahuwabhoj, Hasanganj Kathora, P.O.- Jagdishpur Industrial Area, P.S.- Kamrouli, District- Amethi (Uttar Pradesh) 2. Raju, Aged about 32 years, S/O- Pahadi, R/O- Sitholi, P.O.- Sitholi, P.S.- Kamrouli, District- Amethi (Uttar Pradesh) 3. Ram Chandra @ Mulla @ Ram Chandar Mullah, Aged about 52 years, S/O- Bifaiee, R/O- Khanna Ka Tal, Purab Goura, P.O.- Purab Goura, P.S.- Jamo, District- Amethi (Uttar Pradesh) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-13-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Rail P.S. Koderma Case No.11 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 123, 305 (C) and 103 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners have committed the murder of the wife of the informant by administering poison to her while travelling in a train and looted her belongings. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Drawing attention of this Court towards pages-6, 11 and 12 of the Supplementary Affidavit, which is the copy of the charts of Test Identification Parade, in respect of all three petitioners, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that therein the petitioners could not be identified. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 01.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate Railway, Dhanbad in connection with Rail P.S. Koderma Case No.11 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-13.07.2026-Animesh/