1 2026:HHC:35471 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.929 of 2026 Date of Decision: 21.08.2026 ___________________________________________________ Rameshwar Lal ....Petitioner Versus Sushil Thakur and another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. S.S. Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Rekha Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Sidhant Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the judgment under reference has been duly complied with, therefore, he does not want to press this contempt petition. 2. In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition and the matter is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:35471 Consequently, the contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) August 21, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)