[2026:RJ-JP:656] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15536/2025 Champa Ram S/o Raja Ram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Bagriyo Ka Bas, Tan Baadanwadi, Police Station Ahor, District Jalore. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Intjar Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 08/01/2026 1. This anticipatory bail application is filed by the accused petitioner u/S 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 516/2023 registered at police station Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu for offences u/S 420 & 406 IPC. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary. 3. The allegation against the accused petitioner is that he was alongwith Gangaram who has sold fake gold brick to the complainant for a consideration of Rs.9,00,000/-. 4. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submitted that the accused petitioner has not been named in the FIR and he has nothing to do with the transaction regarding the fake gold. He further submitted that he is a known person to Gangaram, therefore he has been implicated as an accused. Counsel further submitted that the petitioner is ready to cooperate in investigation [2026:RJ-JP:656] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15536/2025] and he is not required for any kind of recovery as the alleged fake gold brick was with the complainant. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application but is not able to show how the accused petitioner is connected with the crime except that he is said to be with Gangaram who sold the fake gold brick to the complainant. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner and so also the allegations against him, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar in FIR No. 220/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /388