THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR v. RAM ISMAIL HARGE ADN ANR
FA/2850/2013 · 2026-10-12
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19982 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19982 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 237 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2850 OF 2013 THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR VERSUS RAM ISMAIL HARGE AND ANR ... Mr. S.S. Dande, AGP for appellants ...
CORAM :
SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE :
12th OCTOBER, 2026
ORDER : . Heard learned AGP for the appellants. 2 By this appeal, the appellants assail the Judgment and Award dated 13.04.2007 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Nilanga in Land Acquisition Reference No.403 of 1998. 3 Learned AGP for the appellants submits that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4 In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the 2026:BHC-AUG:48725
2 237_FA_2850_2013 policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4
dated
03.11.2016
with Corrigenda dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only up to four times. 5 Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed. 6 The claimants are at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any. 7 In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending Civil Application, if any, does not survive and is disposed of accordingly.
( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) agd