Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 3.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.16274 of 2026 Pranati Kumari Tripathy ..... Petitioner
Represented by Adv. - Chinmayi Tripathy -versus- State Of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties
Represented by Adv. – A.Mohanty, A.S.C.
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER 22.05.2026
Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State- Opposite Parties. Perused the writ application as well as the documents annexed thereto.
3. The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer:
“It is therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to: i) Admit this case, issue notice to the opp.parties and call for the records; And ii) Direct the Opp Parties to sanction all service and financial benefits including final family pension in favour of the petitioner with appropriate interest @
Page 2 of 3. 18 % calculated from the date of death of husband of the petitioner till actual payment within a stipulated time.
And pass any other order(s) direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may-deem fit and proper.”
4. In course of hearing of the writ application, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner ventilating his grievance has submitted representation before the Secretary to Government Department of School & Mass Education, Bhubaneswar, Opposite Party No.1 under Annexure-10. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the said representation is pending as of now. It is also submitted by the
learned counsel for the Petitioner that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-10 within a stipulated period of time.
5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection if the representation of the Petitioner is considered by the Opposite Party No.1, which is stated to be pending, in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time.
6. Considering the limited nature of grievance of the Petitioner, the writ application is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-10 within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The Opposite Party No.1 shall do well to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-10 by passing a speaking and reasoned order. The decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.1 be also communicated to the Petitioner within ten days thereafter.
Page 3 of 3.
7. With the aforesaid observation/ direction, the writ application stands disposed of.
8. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.
( A.K. Mohapatra )
Judge
Debasis