( 2026:HHC:34144 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.852 of 2026 Date of decision: 13.08.2026 Arti Sharma ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr Vikas Rahore, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Deputy Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 12.08.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent-department vide Office Order No.EDN-SE-H(2)B(12)CWP/ACPs-TGT, dated 12.08.2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, if the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 ( 2026:HHC:34144 ) petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available to her under the law. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge August 13, 2026 (reena)