Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19972 (KAR)

SHRI T.K. RAJAN v. M/S. KARNATAKA ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

RFA/1022/2014 · 2026-06-02

D K Singh, T M Nadaf

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25782-DB RFA No. 1022 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1022 OF 2014 (MON) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI T.K. RAJAN PWD CLASS I CONTRACTOR 1ST FLOOR, KANCHAN CENTRE, KULAI, MANGALORE 575 019. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VIKRAM U R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. KARNATAKA ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED A COMPANY WHOLLY OWNED BY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA AND INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 16/J-1, INSTITUTE OF TOWN PLANNERS MILLERS TANK BED AREA, BANGALORE 560 052. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MANGALORE DIVISION Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25782-DB RFA No. 1022 of 2014 MANGALORE-575001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ.V SABARAD, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. H.L.PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96, ORDERS 41, R/W, RULE-1 AND 2 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.02.2014 PASSED IN O.S.894/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE 42nd-ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY, THEREBY DISMISSING THE COUNTER CLAIM. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo to withdraw this appeal which has been pending on the file of this Court since 2014. 2. Memo is accepted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25782-DB RFA No. 1022 of 2014 3. In view of withdrawal of the appeal, the appellant would be entitled to refund of the Court fee, as may be permissible, under the relevant Rules. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE RKA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1