VALLABHANENI VAMSI MOHAN v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/12809/2026 · 2026-05-04
B Krishna Mohan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1997 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1997 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010243532026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 12809/2026 Between:
1. VALLABHANENI VAMSI MOHAN, S/O. LATE RAMESH CHAND, AGE 53 YEARS, R/O. PENTHOUSE, R.S. KALYANI TOWERS, 0PP. ST. JOHNS HIGH SCHOOL, SRINAGAR COLONY, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-521101. ...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522239
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE OFFICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521001. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, PARASUPETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521001. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HANUMAN JUNCTION POLICE STATION, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521105. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, HANUMAN JUNCTION POLICE STATION BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRD PRADESH -521105. 2 BKM,J W.P.No.12809 of 2026
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 in diverting
and closing the petitioners PGRS Complaint No. KRI202602091336 by routing the same to the very police station against whom the grievance was raised, and its closure by a subordinate officer therein, as arbitrary, illegal, violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the said closure, and further direct the 2nd respondent to re-open and independently consider the petitioners grievance at an appropriate supervisory level unconnected with the officers against whom allegations are made, by examining all relevant records including the endorsement dated 11.11.2024, and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a time frame to be stipulated by this Honble Court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V.Devi Satya Sri Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
3 BKM,J W.P.No.12809 of 2026
The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded.
However, liberty is given to file afresh in accordance with law, if so warranted and if so advised. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 05.05.2026 PGT