[2026:RJ-JP:4995-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1547/2025 Mukesh Goswami Son Of Shri Laxman Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Bhojaan, Police Station Hameerwas, District Churu (Raj.) (At Present Confined In High Security Jail Ajmer (Raj.), ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Inspector General Of Prisons, Directorate Prisons, Ghatgate, Jaipur. 2. District Parole Advisory Committee Churu (Raj.), Through The District Magistrate, Churu (Raj.) 3. The Superintendent High Security Jail, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tekchand Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Aman Agarwal Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Vinod Sharma Mr. Shree Ram Dhaker, DGC Mr. Abhisek Surana, the District Magistrate, Churu Mr. Jai Yadav, the Superintendent of Police, Churu Mr. Rajesh Yogi, the Superintendent District Jail, Churu Mr. Dinesh Kumar, the Probation and Prison Welfare Officer of Social Justice and Empowerment Department, Churu HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment / Order 03/02/2026 Pursuant to order of this Court dated 30.01.2026, S/Shri Abhishek Surana-the District Magistrate, Churu, Jai Yadav-the [2026:RJ-JP:4995-DB] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1547/2025] Superintendent of Police, Churu, Rajesh Yogi-the Superintendent District Jail, Churu and Dinesh Kumar-the Probation and Prison Welfare Officer of Social Justice and Empowerment Department, Churu are present. They have submitted their affidavits as also additional affidavits dated 03.02.2026, which are taken on record. It is stated in the additional affidavits that on account of a bonafide mistake, the order impugned came to be passed and they never intended disobedience of this Court’s order dated 13.10.2025. They tendered their unconditional apology for unintentional disobedience. Learned Government Advocate cum Additional Advocate General submits that the order impugned came to be passed under a bonafide mistake and extends an assurance on behalf of the Members of the District Parole Advisory Committee, Churu to remain careful in future. He further submits that since, the petitioner is in judicial custody in another criminal case arising out of FIR No.40/2025 registered at Police Station Bahal, District Bhiwani (Haryana), he cannot be extended regular parole. He, therefore, prays that the criminal writ petition be dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute that he is behind the bars in the aforesaid criminal case. In view thereof, he prays for and is granted liberty to withdraw this criminal writ petition. Accordingly, the criminal writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the Members of the District Parole Advisory Committee, Churu are cautioned to remain careful in future especially, while ensuring compliance of the directions of the Court [2026:RJ-JP:4995-DB] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1547/2025] in their letter and spirit. They undertake to consider the case of the petitioner for regular parole as and when he is extended benefit of bail in the aforesaid criminal case. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/36