Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19969 (KAR)

SRI. KUMAR. S. N. v. SRI. M.N. KESHAVAPRASAD,

CRL.RP/253/2026 · 2026-06-09

H P Sandesh

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27341 CRL.RP No. 253 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.253 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. KUMAR S.N., S/O. LATE PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT.NO.36, 6TH MAIN 9TH CROSS, SARASWATHIPURAM MYSURU-570 001. ALSO R/O PROPRIETOR OF ROOPAHREE SELECTION SHOP NO.2 AND 3 GROUND FLOOR, HONGKONG BAZAAR K.T. STREET, DEVARAJA MOHALLA MYSURU-570 001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RUPESH KUMAR S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. M.N. KESHAVAPRASAD S/O M.V. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.216, UTTARADI MATH 5TH CROSS, KHILLE MOHALLA MYSURU-570 006. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. KESHAV R. AGNIHOTRI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27341 CRL.RP No. 253 of 2026 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 16.12.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED III ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT MYSURU IN C.C. NO.1887/2019 AND THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.12.2025 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MYSURU IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.18/2025 AND PASS SUCH OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER OR JUDGMENT AS DEEMED FIT TO PASS UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that conditional order dated 12.02.2026 passed while suspending the sentence is not complied with and no material is placed before the Court regarding compliance. Hence, question of entertaining the revision petition does not arise, in view of non- compliance of conditional order passed by this Court. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed since the conditional order has not been complied with and revision petition is also not yet admitted. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11