Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19965 (KAR)

SRI.K. ANDANAIAH v. JAYARAMU K N

CRL.RP/633/2025 · 2026-06-09

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27399 CRL.RP No. 633 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 633 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K. ANDANAIAH S/O KARIMUDDAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O A.H.C.D.R., RESERVE POLICE MANDYA, AND ALSO R/O HALAHALLI SLUM, NEAR BISILUMARAMMA TEMPLE, UDAYAGIRI, CIRANAHALLI ROAD, MANDYA-571 401. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R. PRAMOD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. JAYARAMU K.N., S/O NINGEGOWDA AGED 73 YEARS R/O NO.58/3, 9TH CROSS SHAKAMBARINAGARA J.P.NAGARA, 1ST STAGE BENGALURU-560003 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401(FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 10.03.2025 PASSED BY LXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU CITY, BENGALURU (CCH-69) IN CRL.A.NO.672/2022 AND THE ORDER DATED 27.04.2022 PASSED BY THE 12TH ACMM AT BENGALURU Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27399 CRL.RP No. 633 of 2025 (SCH-8) CONVICTING THE ACCUSED FOR AN OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF NI ACT IN C.C.NO.2033/2018. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an application praying this Court to extend the time for complying the order dated 05.06.2025 and the reason assigned in the application is that the petitioner was having financial difficulty and hence, he could not deposit the amount. After lapse of one year, present application is filed and the application is also not filed before expiry of the time granted by this Court to deposit the fine amount. 2. When such being the case, no ground is made out to allow the application. Accordingly, the application is rejected. Consequently, the revision petition is also dismissed for non- compliance of the conditional order, since the revision petition is not yet admitted. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4