Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19959 (PNJ)

ARVIND v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

INCOMP/1132/2026 · 2026-05-14

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

INCOMP-113 IN THE (144) ARVIND AN STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. 2. Haryana High have been rais who filed it fo days. Howeve for removing thereof, the p afresh after rem  14.05.2026 Amit Sharma 1132-2026 (O&M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH IN Da AND ANR. Versus OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA None ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) There is no representation on beha As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part- High Court Rules and Orders, the p raised by the Registry is to be taken d it for the purpose of refiling the s owever, as per Registry, the present ca oving objection(s) despite lapse of the present case is dismissed in def fter removing the objection(s) so raised Whether speaking/reasoned:    JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH INCOMP-1132-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA  n behalf of the petitioner. -A, Volume V of Punjab and , the petition on which objections e taken back by the counsel/party, the same within a period of 40 sent case has not been taken back se of aforesaid period. In view in default, with liberty to file it raised by the Registry. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ned:- Yes/No   AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.