Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19955 (CHH)

GRAM PANCHAYAT KHAPRADIH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2238/2026 · 2026-05-11

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22161 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2238 of 2026 1 - Gram Panchayat Khapradih Through Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Khapradih, Janpad Panchayat Simga, Distt.- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Mining Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Collector Baloda Bazar, Distt.- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.). 3 - Environment Conservation Board Through Secretary, Environment Conservation Board, Paryawaran Bhawan, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Raipur (C.G.). 4 - Shree Cement Company Limited Through Chief Executive Officer, Khapradih, Tah. Simga, Distt.- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.). 5 - Unit Head, Shree Cement Company Limited, Khapradih, Tah. Simga, Distt.- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akash Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Manuraj Singh, Advocate. For Respondents No. 4 & 5 : Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Rahul Ambast, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 12/05/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of MANDAMUS directing the respondent authorities to decide the representations made by the petitioner expeditiously within the stipulated time as framed by this Hon'ble Court and may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to take necessary actions. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue any writ or direction or order as deem feet in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition along with relevant documents. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 3 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat