BHARAT LAL S/O ARJUN LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15621/2025 · 2026-01-09
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19953 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19953 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:826] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15621/2025 Bharat Lal S/o Arjun Lal Meena, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Bagad Rajput, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 09/01/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0291/2020 registered at Police Station Udyog Nagar, District Alwar for offences under Sections 332, 353, 395 IPC and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
1989.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that co-accused Summat Ram and Banwari Lal have been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.10.2020 and other co-accused Amar Singh, Mahendra Singh, Deewan Singh and Nanak Singh also got benefit of bail by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court on 15.10.2020. He averred that case
[2026:RJ-JP:826] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15621/2025] of the present petitioner is akin to them. He further submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 27.10.2025. The charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Bharat Lal S/o Arjun Lal Meena, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/86