Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19951 (CHH)

LEOS TIRKEY v. DR. KAMAL PREET SINGH

CONT/664/2026 · 2026-05-06

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21293 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 664 of 2026 Leos Tirkey S/o Lt. Barnabas Tirkey Aged About 55 Years Posted As Sub- Engineer Office Of Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Public Works Department, Pathalgaon, Division Pathalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus Dr. Kamal Preet Singh Posted As Secretary, Public Works Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 07/05/2026 Heard. 1. The present contempt petition arises out of the alleged non-compliance of the order dated 03.02.2026 passed in WPS No. 1243 of 2026. 2. Perusal of the order dated 03.02.2026 would show that this Court had directed the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before respondent No. 1 and, upon such representation being filed, respondent No. 1 was directed to consider and decide the same preferably within a period of three weeks. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.05.08 10:46:40 +0530 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner himself has not submitted any representation before respondent No. 1. However, a representation dated 20.02.2026 was submitted through counsel, but no representation has been filed by the petitioner in his personal capacity till date. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. From perusal of the pleadings and consideration of the submissions made, it appears that the direction issued by this Court was specifically to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation. However, from the pleadings and documents annexed with the contempt petition, it is evident that no such representation has been submitted by the petitioner himself. 6. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant contempt petition with liberty to file a fresh representation before the concerned authority, i.e., the Secretary, Public Works Department, in terms of the order dated 03.02.2026 passed in WPS No. 1243 of 2026. 7. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti