APHC010177742010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 790/2010 Between: 1. BHUKYA SRI PADMAVATHI DEVI @ SRI PADMA, W/O. SRINIVASA NAIK, HOUSEWIFE R/O. VADITYA KRISHNA VIDYANAGAR, ELURU, ...APPELLANT AND 1. BHUKYA SRINIVASA NAIK, S/o. Rama Rao Vice President, Namavaram Village, Chintalapudi West Godavari District, CJCJC. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders to set aside the order dated 13.09.2010 passed in OP.No.125/2007 by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Eluru, West Godavari District and thereby allow the appeal granting counter claim for restitution of conjugal rights by directing the respondent to join the appellant for leading matrimonial life in the interests of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 1987 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order dated 13.09.2010 passed in OP.No. 125/2007 by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Eluru, West Godavari District, pending disposal of the main appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 2 (RNT,J & MRK,J C.M.A. NO.790 OF 2010) 1. G RONALD RAJU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA 3 (RNT,J & MRK,J C.M.A. NO.790 OF 2010) The Court made the following: JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 28.02.2025, the following order was passed : “This appeal is preferred by the wife aggrieved by the decree of divorce granted on the petition of the husband under Section 13 (1)(ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act. 2. By an order dated 04.10.2010, the order impugned in the appeal was suspended. 3. No representation on either side. 4. Granting one more opportunity to the parties to appear through counsel as well and argue the matter, post after two (02) weeks in the weekly cause-list.” 2. Though the appeal is listed under the caption of ‘old matters’, today also, there is no representation on either side. 3. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date : 28.01.2026. RPD/PBS. 4 (RNT,J & MRK,J C.M.A. NO.790 OF 2010) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM (DISMISSED FOR NON- PROSECUTION) CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 790 OF 2010 Date: 28.01.2026 RPD/PBS.