On 06.05.2026, this Court had passed the following order: “Learned counsel contends that surfaced on the disclosure statement of co from whom non-commercial quantity of contraband, it being 14.24 grams of heroin, was allegedly recovered. There is no recovery effected from the petitioner. Reliance is placed on the judgment passed by Hon’ble Court in the case of Toofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, 2021 (1) RCR (Criminal) 1 any other case; ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the cooperate. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 13.05 arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance , this Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel contends that name of the petitioner surfaced on the disclosure statement of co-accused Sudesh, commercial quantity of contraband, it being 14.24 grams of heroin, was allegedly recovered. There is no recovery effected from the petitioner. Reliance ed on the judgment passed by Hon’ble the Supreme Toofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil , 2021 (1) RCR (Criminal) 1. He is not involved in ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will At the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. , the petitioner is directed to join the 13.05.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.20 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 20.05.2026.” 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Avtar Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 06.05.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.20 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.