(1) 4- c.p. 219-2009 IN W. P. 2059-2008.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 219 OF 2009 IN WP/2059/2008 TUKARAM KHANDU NAVLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ….. AGP for Respondents: Mr. N. B. Patil ...... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J. DATED : OCTOBER 12, 2026 ORDER (PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV J.):- 1. In the order under contempt, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were directed to decide the application of the petitioner after hearing the concerned parties within a period of three months. 2. Thereafter, the Contempt Petition is dismissed against respondent Nos. 2 and 3 as the petitioner has not taken any steps to serve respondent Nos.2 and 3. Thereafter the petition is not circulated since 03.02.2014. Therefore, it seems that, the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the Contempt Petition. 3. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/