[2026:RJ-JP:4428] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15262/2025 Ranjeet Singh S/o Shri Tiku Ram, R/o Bajroli, Police Station Nechwa, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anisha Yadav For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor Mr. Raj Kumar Kasana for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 30/01/2026 1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.224/2025 registered at Police Station Bagar, District Jhunjhunu for the offence under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor assisted by counsel for the complainant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is a registered owner of the vehicle in regard to which, the allegations have been levelled against the present accused- petitioner of theft. She further submits that the complainant is a partner in the business and because of some dispute in between them, the complainant has lodged this criminal case against the [2026:RJ-JP:4428] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15262/2025] present accused-petitioner. She also submits that the accused- petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigation in future. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that though the vehicle-in-question was purchased in a partnership of the accused-petitioner and the complainant but it was liability of the complainant to maintain the said vehicle. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has taken away the vehicle without informing the complainant. 7. On consideration of submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor assisted by counsel for the complainant, it is revealed that the vehicle for which this criminal case for theft has been lodged is in the registered ownership of the accused-petitioner. 8. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the vehicle-in- question is registered in the name of the present accused- petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner. 9. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioner named above in connection with FIR No.224/2025 registered at Police Station Bagar, District Jhunjhunu shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of [2026:RJ-JP:4428] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15262/2025] Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /246