Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-19840-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.226 CRM-M-19840-2026 Decided on : 22.05.2026 Sukhchain @ Sukhle
...... Petitioner
Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM :
*** Present : Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State. ***
, J (ORAL)
!"#$ % &
$ '
( %& ') '
* ))
% & ("+ ),- .
.
.
- . .
-
-/
!"# MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.22 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
CRM-M-19840-2026 2 0
-
1 -
.
0 contends that mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act were not complied with at the time of alleged search and seizure. She further contends that the recovery of alleged contraband has already been effected from the petitioner and nothing more is recovered from him. Learned counsel contends that the recovered quantity is non-commercial in nature. 2
% & 2 1
- 3
3 1 - &
.
4- /
-
.
-
.
1
2
1
. 0
.
. /
1 -
- --
/
-
11 -
- -
/1
1
- -
31 - 5 3 1
- 3
3
1 -3 &
.
4- - MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.22 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
CRM-M-19840-2026 3 -
.
1
/
.
. 1 1
( 6 " #
)-
. / 7 (46
-
1 - -
( 6 "
(
-
11 8 - -
9
:
)- / ; -6 !" ! #
$ .
-
.
)
11 8
9
:2 1
)-
< .=<
!
!
!
" 1 . 1
.
MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.22 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
CRM-M-19840-2026 4
8
6 8' +
86*+ "
4
-
-- Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No > =?
8 MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.22 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh