Gujju Narasimharaju v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/8689/2026 · 2026-03-31
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19932 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19932 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No: W.P.No.8689 of 2026
PROCEEDING SHEET
SL. NO. DATE
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
01. 01.04.2026
Dr.YLR, J
The Petitioners herein, along with two others, filed W.P. No.28900 of 2023 before this Court and obtained an order dated 03.11.2023, directing the revenue authorities to mutate their names in the revenue records.
Respondent No.4 addressed a letter dated 23.03.2026 to Respondent No.3, stating that certain third parties are the absolute owners of the disputed land and certifying that the said third parties are in possession of the property.
The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that, based on the said letter issued by the Tahsildar, Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners’ property.
On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the police have not interfered in the civil dispute between
contd…
2
SL. NO. DATE
ORDER OFFICE NOTE the Petitioners and the said third parties.
The learned counsel for Respondent No.4 seeks time to obtain instructions. Accordingly, list the matter after two (02) weeks.
In the meanwhile, Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the properties of Petitioner No.1 to an extent of Ac.1.00 and Petitioner No.2 to an extent of Ac.1.00, situated at Swarnavarigudem Village, Jeelugumilli Mandal, Eluru District, and not to summon the Petitioners to the police station for attending any inquiry with regard to the property dispute.
_________ Dr.YLR, J KMS