[2026:RJ-JP:1443] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 15407/2025 Surgyan Bawariya S/o Shri Ram Karan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kacchi Basti, Basadi, P.S. Bhankrota, Jaipur at Present Resident of Suman Vihar, Nimeda, Police Station Bindayaka, Jaipur (Raj.) (Accused presently confined at Central Jail, Jaipur, Raj.) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Goverdhan Singh, SI, Police Station Bindayaka, District Jaipur (West) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 13/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 134/2025 registered at Police Station Bindayaka, District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 331(3), 305(a)/62, 126(2), 115(2), 351(3) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is behind the bars ever-since 14.08.2025 and the co- accused have already been enlarged on bail. 3. Investigation Officer has marked his presence and has submitted that strong antecedents (approximately a dozen) are registered qua the petitioner, of various nature, of particular [2026:RJ-JP:1443] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15407/2025] locality i.e. Kalwar, Kanota and Jamawaramgarh. He has submitted that releasing the applicant on bail may be a threat to society and the locality. 4. Wife, mother and sister of the applicant have also marked appearance in the Court, and submitted that the applicant’s wife has an infant child and she is ready and willing to take the applicant at her maternal home for a period of one year, with an undertaking that they will return back to Jaipur only when the applicant is reformed or after a period of one year. 5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has stoutly opposed to the present application. 6. Having heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties, taking note of the fact that the co-accused have been enlarged on bail; that the trial will take a long time; the undertaking given by the wife of the applicant, and looking to overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record, this Court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant, subject to the following conditions: 7.1 That atleast for a period of one year the applicant along with his wife and child shall reside in Tonk at his in-laws' place or elsewhere, i.e. away from the territorial jurisdiction of Jaipur. 7.2 That the applicant shall mark attendance before the concerned jurisdictional Police Station (at Tonk) on 5th date of every month at 11:00 A.M. The SHO of said Police Station shall forward the attendance of the applicant, on monthly basis, to the jurisdictional Police Station vis-a-vis the FIR (Supra). 8. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Surgyan [2026:RJ-JP:1443] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15407/2025] Bawariya S/o Shri Ram Karan shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 9. It is made clear that the aforestated conditions shall not restrict the applicant from marking attendance, as and when, warranted by any judicial authority in any other pending cases. (SAMEER JAIN),J GARIMA /261