ARB.P. 566/2026 1 $~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010132242026 + ARB.P. 566/2026 RUPESH CHAUHAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mukul Lather, Ms. Amrita Sarkar, Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh, Mr. Kartik Gupta and Mr. Gitesh Sinha, Advocates. versus NANDI INFRATECH PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, Mr. Ajitesh Kumar, Mr. Shivanshu Srivastava, Mr. Kritika Mehrotra, Advocates (through V.C.) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 28.09.2026 1. The present petition filed under Section 11(6) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seeks appointment of Arbitrator. 2. After issuance of notice, respondent put in appearance and the matter was referred to Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre on 29.04.2026. It has now been informed that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. 3. The terms of settlement have been duly recorded in Conciliated Agreement dated 15.09.2026, which took place before the abovesaid Centre. 4. The report from Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre has been received. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2026 at 11:01:57 ARB.P. 566/2026 2 5. During course of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that a cheque of Rs.12,11,639/- was earlier issued by the respondent but when presented, it returned dishonoured. He submits that thereafter the amount has been duly paid through RTGS and, therefore, the abovesaid cheque in original would be returned to respondent. Such statement in taken on record 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of abovesaid settlement, the petitioner is left with no grievance in the matter as he has already received the settlement amount. He, therefore, does not press the petition in question. 7. Learned counsel for the respondent has joined the proceedings through video-conferencing and reiterates the terms of settlement. 8. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of amicable settlement between the parties. MANOJ JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2026 st/js This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2026 at 11:01:57