Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1993 (BOM)

PRANITA PARAB AND ANR v. MARIA MAXIMA DSOUZA ALIAS MAZIMIANA DSOUZA AND 4 ORS

MCA/424/2026 · 2026-08-20

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

MCA 424 of 2026 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.424 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.9 OF 2025 PRANITA PARAB AND ANR ... APPLICANT VS MARIA MAXIMA DSOUZA ALIAS MAZIMIANA DSOUZA AND 4 ORS ... RESPONDENTS Advocate present for the Applicants : Advocate Virendra Parshekar, holding for Advocate Tejas Rane REGISTRAR'S ORDER This matter has been placed on Board for Orders. The MCA is filed for deleting the names of Respondent No. 3(c) and 5 from the cause title. Advocate Virendra Parsekar is present for the Applicants, holding for Advocate Tejas Rane. He submits that the said Application is filed on the basis that right to sue survives even after deleting the names of the above-stated Respondents. Advocate Virendra Parsekar has submitted that the Applicants have sought the deletion of names of the above-stated Respondents at their own discretion. Hence, it is not necessary to dwell into the aspect whether Respondent Nos. 3(c) and 5 have any right in the property. 20th August, 2026 MCA 424 of 2026 ORDER 'Upon considering the submission of Applicants and Advocate Virendra Parsekar, MCA/424/2026 is allowed. Accordingly, the names of Respondent No. 3 (c) and 5 be deleted from the cause title. All the necessary amendments to be carried out within 14 days from the date of this Order.' Dated: 20th August, 2026 ( Irshad Agha ) (Registrar Judicial) ADN* 20th August, 2026