CHOUTUPALLI SUNIL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/9058/2025 · 2026-01-20
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19927 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19927 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010174972025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT:THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between:
1. CHOUTUPALLI SUNIL KUMAR, S/O LATE PRASAD AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC MDU OPERATOR, GUJJANAGUNDAL, GUNTUR WEST, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOOD, CIVIL DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring th respondent in issuing the impugned order bearing Procs. Rc.No. 404/2025 dt. 20-3-2025 terminating the without property appreciating arbitrary, unilateral and unconstitutional
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) , THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 9058/2025 CHOUTUPALLI SUNIL KUMAR, S/O LATE PRASAD AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC MDU OPERATOR, GUJJANAGUNDAL, GUNTUR WEST, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR THE CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned order bearing Procs. Rc.No. 404/2025 2025 terminating the services of the petitioner as MDU Operator without property appreciating the explanation 11-3-2025, as being i and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same
RC,J W.P.No.9058 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] FIRST DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CHOUTUPALLI SUNIL KUMAR, S/O LATE PRASAD AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC MDU OPERATOR, GUJJANAGUNDAL, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR THE CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR ...RESPONDENT(S): of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one e action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned order bearing Procs. Rc.No. 404/2025-B the petitioner as MDU Operator 2025, as being illegal, and consequently set aside the same. RC,J W.P.No.9058 of 2025 2
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 herein to authorities to continue the petitioner as MDU Operator by suspending the impugned order bearing Procs. Rc.No. 4045/2025-B dt. 20-3-2025, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K JOSEPH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following:
ORDER
Sri K.Joseph, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that cause in this writ petition no longer survives and this writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
RR