APHC010200072026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10086/2026 Between: 1. ORUGU RAMESH, S/O ORUGU JAMALAYYA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE AND GOAT REARING, R/O D.NO. 6/32-C, KOTHURU VILLAGE, (SUBURB OF G. KONDURU), G. KONDURU MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, G. KONDURU POLICE STATION, G. KONDURU MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, G. KONDURU MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, G. KONDURU MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R MAHESWARA RAO PALETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: “…to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, especially Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, in interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of his house site, and in illegally threatening, summoning and detaining the petitioner and his family members in connection with a purely civil dispute, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's house site except in accordance with due process of law not to harass, threaten, summon or detain the petitioner and his family members in relation to the said civil dispute, and pass…” 2. Heard the learned counsel for Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. V. R. Maheswara Rao Paleti, learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are interfering with the Petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of his house site and are threatening the Petitioner and his family members. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, submits that the respondents have never interfered with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner and his family members, nor compelled the Petitioner to attend the police station without any cause. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and upon recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 not to 3 interfere in the civil dispute of the Petitioner henceforth, except in accordance with due process of law. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 07.05.2026 KS 4 299 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10086 of 2026 Date: 07.05.2026 KS