Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19918 (KAR)

SRI. SHIVANNA v. THE GOVERNOR OFKARNATAKA

WP/7363/2024 · 2026-06-04

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26303 WP NO.7363 OF 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.7363 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. SHIVANNA S/O SRI. LAKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, SRINIVASAPURA, HONASIGERE POST, HEBBUR, TUMAKURU - 572 120. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. Y. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE A/W SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, OPP. DRDO, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY THE TAHSILDAR. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIKASA SODUHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. 3. THE TAHSILDAR TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU - 572 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26303 WP NO.7363 OF 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT-AUTHORITIES TO DIRECT THE REVENUE OFFICIALS CONCERNED TO ENTER THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN COLUMN NOS.9 AND 12 OF THE RTC OF LAND IN SURVEY NO.38/2, MEASURING 01 ACRE 371/2 GUNTAS, SITUATE AT KARENAHALLI VILLAGE, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, MARKED AS ANNEXURES 'F' AND 'F1' AND CONSEQUENTIAL ENTRIES THEREOF IN THE RELEVANT REVENUE RECORDS RELATED TO THE SAID LAND; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Smt. B.P. Radha, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this petition, the petitioner is seeking writ in the nature of mandamus against the respondents to cancel the registered Sale Deed dated 20th January, 2003 (Annexure-D) executed in respect of the subject land; inter alia sought for direction to the respondent-Authorities to enter the name of the petitioner in revenue records. 3. Heard Sri. Y. Nagaraj along with Sri. C. Shankar Reddy C., learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. B.P. Radha, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26303 WP NO.7363 OF 2024 4. Having taken note of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, I am of the view that the petitioner herein has to approach the competent Civil Court for the relief of cancellation of registered Sale Deed dated 20th January, 2003 (Annexure-D), if he is aggrieved by the same. Therefore, no interference be called for in this petition. Accordingly, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court, Writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17